Photo courtesy of Elemental Music.
Applications are reviewed and scored by a peer review panel made up of artists, arts professionals, community members, and others with knowledge and professional qualifications in the arts, and with familiarity of the Los Angeles region’s arts sector. Review panels are made up of practitioners, administrators, and educators. Special care is taken to ensure that they reflect the diversity of the region.
Nominate a Panelist
Individuals can nominate up to four panelists for one or more programs by providing their information in the application form. If you are using the form to nominate individuals other than yourself, you want to nominate other individuals at a later date or you would like to nominate more than four individuals at a time, you may use the same link to continue nominations.
Panel Review Criteria
OGP applications will be reviewed and scored by a panel according to the following criteria. Each question on the application ties back to one or more of these criteria. The criteria appear in square brackets following each question
Want More Info?
For more information, please contact Grants staff at grants@arts.lacounty.gov or (213) 202-5858.
OGP 1 REVIEW CRITERIA
Review Criteria | Maximum Point Value |
---|---|
CRITERION 1: Artistic Quality of Organization | 35 |
CRITERION 2: Organizational Readiness | 15 |
CRITERION 3: Quality of Project Plan | 20 |
CRITERION 4: Quality of Project Evaluation | 5 |
CRITERION 5: Awareness of, and Response to, Community Needs | 25 |
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS | 100 |
OGP 2 REVIEW CRITERIA
Review Criteria | Maximum Point Value |
---|---|
CRITERION 1: Artistic Quality of Organization | 35 |
CRITERION 2: Management Capacity | 15 |
CRITERION 3: Quality of Project Plan | 20 |
CRITERION 4: Quality of Project Evaluation | 5 |
CRITERION 5: Relationship with Audience/Community | 25 |
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS | 100 |
OGP 3 & 4 REVIEW CRITERIA
Review Criteria | Maximum Point Value |
---|---|
CRITERION 1: Artistic Quality of Organization | 35 |
CRITERION 2: Managerial Excellence | 15 |
CRITERION 3: Quality of Project Plan | 20 |
CRITERION 4: Quality of Project Evaluation | 5 |
CRITERION 5: Defined/Addressed Community Need | 25 |
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS | 100 |